Every engagement is independent: we do not resell hardware, licenses, or managed services. Offerings marked limited release or planned are described honestly below — no empty coming-soon pages.
Independent review of governance, cybersecurity, continuity, infrastructure, vendors, documentation, operations, and AI readiness, producing an executive report, prioritized risk register, and 12-24 month roadmap.
What this means for youFind out what is fragile, what is costing more than it should, and what leadership should address first.
Typical starting investmentStarts at $4,500 for single-location organizations and scales with infrastructure complexity.
Ongoing strategy, budgeting, governance, vendor oversight, executive reporting, and project prioritization without immediately hiring a full-time CIO or CTO.
What this means for youGain a senior technology leader for major decisions without immediately hiring a full-time executive.
Typical starting investmentRetainers start at $2,500 per month, scaled to the level of ongoing support and board-facing governance required.
Service catalogs, request forms, approvals, incident and change workflows, SLAs, automation, knowledge integration, and reporting.
What this means for youReplace requests lost in email and repetitive manual steps with clear, trackable processes.
Typical starting investmentDefined implementation projects start at $3,500.
RFP development, proposal comparison, technical and commercial review, total-cost analysis, project governance, vendor coordination, and executive reporting.
What this means for youGet an independent second opinion before signing a technology contract or committing to a major project.
Typical starting investmentStandard vendor-selection and advisory engagements start at $3,500.
Knowledge architecture, Confluence or SharePoint planning, standard procedures, system documentation, continuity documentation, ownership, and review processes.
What this means for youReduce the risk of critical knowledge living only in one employee's head or scattered files.
Typical starting investmentFoundational architecture and documentation projects start at $3,000.
Program-level guidance across identity, endpoints, email, continuity, policy, people, vendors, insurance readiness, and board reporting. No promise to eliminate all risk.
What this means for youTurn disconnected security tools into a practical program leadership can understand and govern.
Typical starting investmentProgram-development and risk-advisory engagements start at $5,000.
Current-state review, Microsoft 365 and Azure planning, endpoint strategy, networks, identity, virtualization, continuity architecture, vendor selection, and migration oversight.
What this means for youPlan upgrades and migrations without buying technology in the wrong order or creating avoidable disruption.
AI-readiness assessments, approved-use policy, use-case workshops, privacy and data review, pilot design, workflow standards, training, and measurement.
What this means for youIdentify where AI can help, where it creates risk, and what rules employees need.
Leadership and board workshops on technology risk, cybersecurity, AI governance, vendor decisions, roadmaps, service management, and continuity.
What this means for youHelp leaders and boards understand complex technology decisions without requiring technical backgrounds.
Final scope and fees depend on organizational size, number of locations, systems involved, required depth, and engagement duration. A written scope and fee are provided before work begins.
Engagement model
Most engagements begin with a defined discovery or assessment rather than an open-ended consulting commitment. The result is a clear understanding of the organization’s priorities, followed by the level of support that best fits its needs.
A focused conversation about the organization, its technology environment, current concerns, upcoming decisions, and whether the engagement is a strong fit.
A fixed-scope review of relevant systems, risks, stakeholders, vendors, documentation, or workflows.
Leadership receives clear recommendations explaining:
The client may implement independently or retain the practice for:
Best for organizations needing an independent view of current risks, priorities, and investments.
Best for a specific modernization, workflow, documentation, vendor-selection, governance, or planning initiative.
Best for organizations needing recurring executive-level technology guidance without immediately hiring a full-time CIO or CTO.
Engagements are scoped according to organizational size, complexity, number of locations, systems involved, and the depth of analysis required. A written scope and fee are provided before work begins.
Fixed-scope assessments are priced as projects rather than open-ended hourly engagements.